Mercedes-Benz

Mercedes W196R,Mercedes 300 SLR Uhlenhaut , Mille Miglia, Fangio, Moss From legacy to a $135 000 000 Financial Grail

By Pfister Autotechnik-Shop

December 04, 2025

Mercedes W196R,Mercedes 300 SLR Uhlenhaut , Mille Miglia, Fangio, Moss From legacy to a $135 000 000 Financial Grail

MERCEDES-BENZ 300 SLR UHLENHAUT COUPÉ

FORENSIC TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Production: 2 examples (1955-1956)Record sale: May 2022, €135,000,000, RM Sotheby’sAnalysis date: November 2025

MERCEDES-BENZ 300 SLR UHLENHAUT COUPÉ

FORENSIC TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

Units produced: 2 (1955-1956)Record sale: May 2022, €135,000,000, RM Sotheby’sAnalysis date: November 2025

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

On 5 May 2022, inside a closed room at the Mercedes-Benz Museum Stuttgart, ten collectors pre-selected by Mercedes-Benz AG and RM Sotheby’s attended an unprecedented private auction. No press, no photographers, absolute confidentiality. The object: one of two existing examples of the 300 SLR Uhlenhaut Coupé, a vehicle that had belonged to Mercedes uninterruptedly for 67 years (1955-2022). After approximately 90 minutes of proceedings, the hammer fell at €135,000,000. Absolute record for a vehicle sold at auction. The gap with the second-highest price ever achieved—a Ferrari 250 GTO sold for €49.2 million in November 2023—stands at +174%, unprecedented in the history of automotive, painting, diamond, or luxury real estate auctions.

The buyer’s identity has never been revealed. Forty months later (November 2025), anonymity holds despite intensive surveillance from the global collector community. No public appearance at major events (Pebble Beach, Villa d’Este, Goodwood), no new photographs, no information leaks. Three hypotheses circulate without confirmation: British collector close to the royal family, Zurich-based Swiss family office, or Californian American UHNWI. The maintenance of this anonymity suggests a profile valuing absolute confidentiality above any social visibility.

This analysis examines the technical reality of a space-frame chassis in chrome-molybdenum steel AISI 4130 with 67 years of existence, the specific failure mechanisms of this aerospace material, and quantified probabilities of structural degradation. It also documents actual carrying costs (insurance €1.35M/year, ultra-secure facility €84k/year, desmodromic maintenance €18-26k/year), absolute rarity (34× rarer than a Ferrari 250 GTO), and structurally 10× lower liquidity

Questions addressed:

On the chassis: What is the actual probability that a critical section of the CrMo 4130 chassis exhibits hydrogen embrittlement after 67 years, and what are remediation costs according to scenarios? Answer sections 2.1.3-2.1.5: significant embrittlement probability 30%, costs €0 to €150k depending on severity, deal-breaker probability <5%. Wall thickness loss from internal corrosion estimated 0.60-0.80mm (30-50% section), probability corrosion >30% critical zones 35-45%.

On the engine: How long does the M196 desmodromic remain maintainable given <10 worldwide specialists and risk of Mercedes support termination? Answer section 2.2: maintenance possible under mandatory 10-20 year Mercedes contract (€500k-€1M), rebuild probability 60-70% (€138k), without contract critical obsolescence risk.

On valuation: What is actual valuation November 2025 after monetary tightening (ECB rates 0% → 3.5%)? Answer section 4: €130-140M, relative stabilization, absolute rarity protects against market corrections.

On financial exposure: What is total actual budget for 10 years detention including acquisition, refurbishment, and annual carrying? What net exposure after €1.5M/year carrying accumulated over 10 years? Answer section 5: total budget €163.2M (acquisition €148.5M + rebuild €0.15M + carrying €14.66M). For break-even after 10 years, resale requires €181.9M accounting for 10% commission, representing +34.8% appreciation or +3.0%/year. Maximum net exposure if 0%/year stagnation: €28.7M loss.

On liquidity: What is probability of resale >€135M within 5-10 years given 10× lower liquidity than GTO? Answer section 3.1: buyer pool 50-100 persons worldwide (vs 500-800 for GTO), sale delay 12-24 months, unique bilateral negotiation. Probability appreciation >€135M over 5 years: 60-70% if comparable market (GTO, W196 F1) continues +4-8%/year trend, 25-35% if market stagnation.

On opportunity cost: €163.2M immobilization over 10 years in asset with expected return +1.2%/year (section 8) versus alternatives. Opportunity cost calculation not provided in this analysis (depends on specific wealth allocation strategy), but raw data available for calculation: €163.2M immobilized, expected return +€21.7M over 10 years (weighted mathematical expectation optimistic/central/pessimistic scenarios).

On pre-purchase inspection: Forensic inspection cost €25-40k (0.02% price), may reveal problems requiring €120-180k work or justify purchase refusal in catastrophic scenarios (<5% probability).

DISCLAIMER

This analysis constitutes forensic technical expertise covering metallurgical, mechanical, historical, and quantified financial aspects of an automotive vehicle. It does not in any way constitute legal, tax, financial, or investment advice. Estimates of failure probabilities, remediation costs, and valuation are based on technical data, market comparisons, and physico-chemical models, but carry inherent uncertainties. Any acquisition decision must be preceded by complete physical inspection of the vehicle by qualified specialists and appropriate consultation with legal and tax advisors. The author disclaims all responsibility for decisions made based on this document.

FREE EXCERPT

This document presents Sections 1 through 3 of the comprehensive technical analysis. The complete analysis (Sections 4 through 8), including methodical valuation, detailed acquisition and carrying costs, hierarchical comparative analysis, technical risk mapping, and final verdict, is available upon request.

1. IDENTIFICATION AND TRACEABILITY

1.1 Technical identification data

The chassis of the Mercedes-Benz 300 SLR Uhlenhaut Coupé derives directly from the W196 Formula 1 monoplace that dominated the 1954-1955 world championship with Juan Manuel Fangio. This technical lineage is not marketing rhetoric but mechanical reality: identical space-frame architecture in chrome-molybdenum steel 4130, identical optimized tubular geometry, identical assembly methodology via TIG welding under inert atmosphere.

Principal components:

Both examples were constructed in 1955-1956 from unused 300 SLR racing chassis (W196 Sport) following the abrupt termination of Mercedes’ competition program after the Le Mans accident June 1955 (Pierre Levegh, 81 fatalities, Mercedes immediately withdrew all racing teams). Two remaining unused SLR chassis were transformed into road-going coupés for internal use only.

Initial destination of examples:

No example was ever sold to a private client before May 2022.

Mileage of sold example: Technical estimate 8,000-12,000 km over 67 years. No official data published by Mercedes or RM Sotheby’s. This estimate relies on: documented Uhlenhaut usage 1955-1969 (home-factory Stuttgart commute 20 km round trip, autobahn Stuttgart-Munich 300 km round trip at cruising speed 260-280 km/h documented in 1957 press), plus preventive maintenance movements post-1969 (50-100 km every 2-3 years).

MERCEDES-BENZ 300 SLR UHLENHAUT COUPÉ

MERCEDES-BENZ 300 SLR UHLENHAUT COUPÉ

1.2 Detailed usage and storage timeline

Period 1955-1956: Construction and delivery

Both prototypes were built at Untertürkheim between late 1955 and early 1956. The space-frame chassis uses AISI 4130 chrome-molybdenum steel identical to W196 F1 monoplaces (1954-1955 world championship, Fangio titles). The M196 powerplant is the same inline 8-cylinder desmodromic as that equipping the 300 SLR racing roadsters that won the 1955 Targa Florio (Moss/Jenkinson) and 1955 Mille Miglia (Moss/Jenkinson, absolute record never beaten: 1,597 km in 10h07, average 157.65 km/h).

The aluminum coupé bodywork with gullwing doors was developed specifically by Uhlenhaut’s team to offer a compromise between aerodynamic performance (Cd estimated 0.42, excellent for the era) and road habitability (two seats with luggage, partial soundproofing, functional heating). Total weight reaches 1,040 kg, representing 255 kg less than the standard 300 SL Gullwing (1,295 kg), savings distributed as follows:

Example 1 was delivered to Rudolf Uhlenhaut late 1956. Example 2 remained at the factory.

Period 1956-1969: Active Uhlenhaut usage (14 years)

Rudolf Uhlenhaut used the vehicle regularly for professional and personal travel. Estimated annual mileage ranges between 500 and 1,000 km, totaling 7,000 to 14,000 km for the period. Documented journeys include:

The autobahn cruising speed of 260-280 km/h is documented in several German automotive press articles of the era. At this speed, the M196 engine runs at approximately 6,800-7,200 rpm in 5th gear (ratio 0.85:1, rear axle 3.42:1), representing 85-90% of the nominal maximum regime of 8,000 rpm. Fuel consumption at this pace reaches 22-26 liters per 100 km, limiting range to 540-640 km with the 140-liter tank.

Maintenance was handled by Mercedes’ competition department at Untertürkheim, according to F1 specifications of the era. Documented or estimated interventions include:

Period 1969-1989: Transition and Uhlenhaut’s death (20 years)

Uhlenhaut retired from racing management in 1972 but retained the vehicle for sporadic personal use. Mileage dropped to less than 100 km per year. Rudolf Uhlenhaut died in 1989 at age 82. The vehicle then returned to Mercedes-Benz AG and was integrated into the company’s historical collection.

Estimated period mileage: <2,000 km over 20 years.

Period 1989-2006: Untertürkheim storage (17 years)

Example 1 was stored in Mercedes’ historical collection reserves at Untertürkheim under controlled conditions. Probable environmental parameters (not officially confirmed):

Usage was strictly limited to preventive maintenance: manual engine rotation every 6 months (100 crankshaft turns to redistribute oil and prevent piston/cylinder seizure), road testing 10-20 km every 2-3 years to verify general functioning.

Major interventions likely during period:

Period 2006-2022: Mercedes-Benz Museum and sale (16 years)

The Mercedes-Benz Museum Stuttgart opened its doors in May 2006. Example 2 (the second Uhlenhaut coupé) has been permanently displayed in the “Silberpfeile” (Silver Arrows) hall on level 4 of the museum, where it has been publicly visible for 16 years without interruption. Example 1, conversely, remained stored at Untertürkheim without public exhibition or appearance at Mercedes events (unlike most major historical vehicles of the marque that regularly tour concours d’élégance such as Pebble Beach or Villa d’Este).

Example 1’s usage during this period remained minimal: preventive maintenance only (50-100 km every 2-3 years). Documented or probable interventions:

In May 2022, Mercedes-Benz AG made the strategic decision to sell Example 1 via private auction organized by RM Sotheby’s. Official communicated motivation: financing the Mercedes-Benz Fund, €135M endowment dedicated to environmental and educational projects. The auction procedure was strictly private, invitation only: 10 collectors pre-selected by Mercedes and RM Sotheby’s according to undisclosed criteria (minimum estimated net worth >€5 billion, documented automotive passion, existing Mercedes relationship).

The auction took place at the Mercedes-Benz Museum Stuttgart on May 5, 2022, attended only by the 10 invited guests (no press, no photographers, absolute confidentiality). The hammer price reached €135,000,000, establishing a new absolute world record for a vehicle sold at auction. The buyer’s identity has never been officially revealed. Unconfirmed speculation mentions: British collector close to royal family, Swiss Zurich family office, or American UHNWI from California (Silicon Valley or New York finance).

The transaction was finalized in July 2022. The RM Sotheby’s commission, not officially disclosed, is estimated at 10% according to ultra-high market standards for this type of exceptional private transaction, representing €13.5M.

Period July 2022-November 2025: Unknown location (3+ years)

Since the sale, no public information has emerged regarding the location, usage, or condition of the sold example. Factual observations:

Unconfirmed hypotheses on current location:

The total anonymity maintained for 40 months suggests an extremely discreet buyer profile valuing absolute confidentiality above even the social visibility typically sought in this market segment.

Status of Example 2: The example displayed at the Mercedes-Benz Museum Stuttgart has never been for sale and never will be according to repeated official declarations by Mercedes-Benz AG. It constitutes a centerpiece of the permanent collection on par with Fangio’s W196 F1 monoplaces or the 1952 300 SL Gullwing prototype.

2. IN-DEPTH STRUCTURAL TECHNICAL ANALYSIS

2.1 Chrome-molybdenum space-frame chassis — Metallurgy and failure modes

The 300 SLR Uhlenhaut’s space-frame chassis represents the direct transfer of Formula 1 technology to road automobiles. The AISI 4130 chrome-molybdenum steel (also designated SAE 4130 in American nomenclature) used for this structure is an aerospace and military material, not standard automotive steel.

2.1.1 Chemical composition and metallurgical properties

AISI 4130 composition:

Chromium forms a passivating chromium oxide Cr₂O₃ layer of nanometric thickness (2-5 nanometers) on the metal surface. This layer, invisible to the naked eye, slows atmospheric corrosion by a factor of 3 to 5 compared to mild steel. However, this protection requires the presence of oxygen to continuously regenerate. Inside the closed chassis tubes, once the trapped oxygen is consumed by initial corrosion, the Cr₂O₃ layer cannot reform and protection disappears.

Molybdenum improves hardenability: it enables obtaining a martensitic (hard) or bainitic (intermediate) structure throughout the piece’s thickness during quenching heat treatment, even for thick sections cooled slowly. This property is critical for chassis tubes whose thickness varies from 1.5 to 2.0 mm.

Mechanical properties after heat treatment:

CrMo 4130 thus offers double the mechanical strength of standard steel, for identical density. This property allows reducing sections (thinner tubes) while maintaining equivalent strength, hence the 27 kg mass savings on the 300 SLR chassis versus the 300 SL (58 kg vs 85 kg).

2.1.2 Geometric architecture and torsional rigidity

The chassis uses approximately 60 kg of AISI 4130 CrMo steel in the form of circular tubes welded according to a three-dimensional geometry optimized by IBM 704 calculations (mainframe installed in Stuttgart mid-1950s). Tubes are distributed into two functional categories:

Primary tubes (longitudinals, main crossmembers):

Secondary tubes (triangulations, reinforcements):

Assembly is via TIG (Tungsten Inert Gas) welding under argon atmosphere. The TIG process uses a non-consumable tungsten electrode creating an electric arc in an inert gas shield of argon (preventing oxidation of the molten pool). Each weld requires precise parameter control:

The chassis contains over 200 individual welds. Post-welding, stress-relief heat treatment at 600-650°C for 1-2 hours is strongly recommended to eliminate residual stresses induced by the thermal cycle (stresses that can locally reach 80-90% of the material’s yield strength).

Measured torsional rigidity: 18,000 N⋅m/degree

This extraordinary value compares as follows:

Physically, a rigidity of 18,000 N⋅m/° means: to generate 1 degree of torsion over the 2.4-meter wheelbase, a torque of 18,000 N⋅m must be applied, equivalent to lifting 1,837 kg at 1 meter from the center of gravity. This represents 1.8× the vehicle’s total weight (1,040 kg). Consequence: during aggressive cornering at 1.0-1.2 g lateral acceleration, the chassis flexes only 0.2-0.3 degrees, maintaining suspension geometry essentially nominal and guaranteeing predictable directional behavior.

2.1.3 Failure mechanism 1: Hydrogen embrittlement

CrMo 4130, despite its remarkable properties, exhibits particular sensitivity to hydrogen embrittlement. This phenomenon was identified in the early 20th century in the pressure vessel industry, but its detailed physicochemical understanding only emerged in the 1960s-1970s.

Sequential embrittlement process:

Stage 1: Surface water exposureWater (H₂O) originates from rain during road use, condensation during day-night thermal cycling, or atmospheric humidity. This water deposits on the metal surface and becomes trapped in cavities (rocker panels, tube interiors).

Stage 2: Electrochemical corrosion reactionAt the metal-water interface, an oxidation reaction occurs:

The produced dihydrogen H₂ partially dissociates into atomic hydrogen H, of very small size (atomic radius 0.053 nanometers, approximately 2,000× smaller than iron’s crystalline cell 0.286 nm).

Stage 3: Hydrogen diffusion into crystalline latticeHydrogen atoms diffuse into the steel’s crystalline lattice via interstitial diffusion. Diffusion velocity follows an Arrhenius law: D = D₀ exp(−Q/RT), where:

At ambient temperature (20°C = 293 K), D ≈ 10⁻⁹ to 10⁻⁸ m²/s. Diffusion distance over 67 years: √(Dt) ≈ √(10⁻⁸ × 3600×24×365×67) ≈ 40 mm, representing the complete wall thickness of a tube.

Stage 4: Segregation to high triaxiality zonesHydrogen preferentially migrates toward:

Hydrogen concentration creates local overpressure (several hundred MPa) when H recombines into H₂ trapped in microcavities. This overpressure adds stress that combines with external mechanical stresses.

Stage 5: Toughness reductionMaterial toughness (crack propagation resistance) progressively diminishes. Measured by Charpy impact energy:

The fracture mode changes: instead of ductile fracture (significant plastic deformation, high energy absorption), intergranular brittle fracture occurs (fracture along grain boundaries, low energy absorption).

Factors accelerating embrittlement:

Embrittlement detection:

Method 1: Charpy test (destructive)Sample extraction 10×10×55 mm, 2 mm deep V-notch. Pendulum impact 25 kg at 5 m/s. Fracture energy measurement.

Method 2: Rockwell C hardness (semi-destructive)Conical diamond indenter, 150 kgf load. Residual penetration depth measurement.

Method 3: Ultrasound + attenuation (non-destructive)Piezo transducer emitting 5-10 MHz ultrasound. Inner wall reflected echo amplitude measurement.

Probabilistic embrittlement estimate for sold example:

Mitigating factors:

Aggravating factors:

Probability of significant embrittlement (>20% toughness loss): 30%

Distribution by zone:

Estimated toughness loss in affected zones: 15-25% (Charpy energy 80 J → 60-68 J)

Catastrophic failure risk:

Decision thresholds and costs:

Recommended pre-purchase forensic inspection cost:

This cost (0.02% of €135M price) is negligible but may reveal issues requiring €100-200k work or justify purchase refusal.

2.1.4 Failure mechanism 2: Internal corrosion of closed tubes

The second major degradation mechanism, intimately coupled with hydrogen embrittlement, is electrochemical internal corrosion of closed tubes. This phenomenon is insidious: it develops inside tubes without external visible manifestation until a very advanced stage.

Why tubes corrode internally:

Chassis tubes are closed at their extremities (butt welding, welded plugs, or crush-welding). If water penetrates inside (condensation, 0.05 mm microcrack infiltration, capillarity through degraded seal), it cannot evacuate. Water remains trapped indefinitely, creating ideal conditions for active, sustained corrosion.

Corrosion process in confined environment:

Initially, trapped water contains dissolved oxygen (8-10 mg O₂/liter at 20°C). This oxygen acts as oxidizer in the cathodic reaction:

Once oxygen is depleted (few days to weeks), the cathodic reaction shifts to water reduction:

This reaction produces dihydrogen H₂ → 2H (atomic hydrogen), creating the hydrogen responsible for embrittlement. We observe the coupling: corrosion produces H which embrittles, embrittlement facilitates cracking which promotes water infiltration thus corrosion. Positive feedback loop accelerating overall degradation.

Corrosion rate by conditions:

Estimated thickness loss over 67 years:

MERCEDES-BENZ 300 SLR UHLENHAUT COUPÉ

Period 1: Active use 1955-1969 (14 years)Vehicle regularly used, rain/salt exposure, significant thermal cycles. Infiltrated water likely contains chlorides + acids (atmospheric pollution). Engine cradle tubes exposed 80-120°C.

Period 2: Mercedes storage 1969-2022 (53 years)Controlled conditions (T 18-20°C, RH 45-50%), minimal usage. Corrosion rate greatly reduced but not zero (potentially trapped water from Period 1 cannot evaporate).

Total thickness loss 67 years:

For tubes with initial thickness 1.5-2.0 mm:

Conservative hypothesis (internal tube protection): loss reduced to 0.30-0.60 mm everywhere.

Final estimate: loss 0.60-0.80 mm on most tubes = 30-50% section

Mechanical consequences of thickness reduction:

For a tube under tensile stress, σ = F/A. If thickness reduced from e₀ to (e₀ − Δe):

Example: 40% thickness loss (0.6 mm on 1.5 mm)

For a tube under compression, critical buckling load F_critical ∝ I ∝ e (moment of inertia proportional to thickness for thin tube). 40% thickness loss → 40% critical buckling load loss → buckling risk under service loads.

Corrosion decision thresholds:

Probability corrosion >30% critical zones: 35-45%

(Comparison 300 SL ex-Fangio Argentina storage 35 years RH 60-80%: 70-80% probability. 300 SLR lower risk profile thanks to optimal Mercedes storage.)

Inspection + treatment cost:

2.1.5 Chassis risk synthesis — Decision matrix

Cumulative probabilities major failures:

Probability ≥1 major issue (scenarios C-D-E): <25%

Comparison 300 SL ex-Fangio (non-optimal Argentina storage 35 years): deal-breaker probability 15-18%. 300 SLR benefits from superior Mercedes storage → reduced risk.

Purchase recommendation:

IMPERATIVELY condition purchase on prior forensic inspection:

This cost (0.02% of €135M price) is negligible but may reveal:

3. MARKET ANALYSIS — ACTUAL TRANSACTIONS AND RARITY

3.1 Absolute rarity — Factual quantification

The 300 SLR Uhlenhaut Coupé cannot be directly compared to any other collector car in terms of absolute rarity. Total production of 2 examples, with only 1 ever accessible to the market (the other locked in Mercedes’ permanent collection), places this vehicle in a class apart.

Comparative rarity table:

The 300 SLR Uhlenhaut is 34 times rarer than the Ferrari 250 GTO, itself considered among the world’s rarest and most desirable automobiles. This rarity is not merely statistical but also structural:

Statistical rarity: 2 examples produced vs 36 GTOsAvailability rarity: 1 saleable (already sold) vs 34 circulating GTOsRenewal rarity: 0 currently available examples vs 1-2 GTOs sold/year

Example 2, displayed at Mercedes-Benz Museum Stuttgart since May 2006, has never been for sale and never will be according to repeated official Mercedes-Benz AG declarations. It constitutes a centerpiece of the permanent collection on par with:

Mercedes considers Example 2 inalienable historical heritage, not a saleable asset.

Liquidity consequence:

The 300 SLR’s liquidity is structurally 10 times inferior to a GTO’s:

3.2 Ultra-rare transactions — Global Top 10 auctions

The May 2022 sale of the 300 SLR Uhlenhaut at €135 million established a new absolute record for a vehicle sold at auction, a record still standing 3.5 years later (November 2025). The gap with the second-highest price ever achieved is unprecedented in automotive auction history.

Global Top 10 auctions all categories:

Gap #1 vs #2: €135M ÷ €49.2M = 2.74× (+174%)

This gap is unprecedented in the history of luxury goods auctions across all categories. Normally, the gap between the absolute record and second price ranges between 5% and 15%.

Comparisons other luxury markets:

The +174% gap for the 300 SLR suggests this car occupies a distinct category, not merely the summit of a continuum. It’s not “the finest collector car,” it’s “in a class of its own.”

Factors explaining +174% gap:

1. Rarity 34× superior1 saleable example vs 34 GTOs. Supply = 1, demand ≥ 2 → price explosion per supply/demand law.

2. Mercedes provenance 67 uninterrupted yearsAbsolute traceability from 1955 construction through 2022 sale, never leaving Mercedes. GTOs: 5-15 historical ownership changes → risks of contested provenance, undocumented accidents, questionable restorations.

3. Timing May 2022 = market peakMaximal post-COVID liquidity, 0% interest rates (ECB, FED), UHNWI capital seeking decorrelated assets. If sold 2023-2025 (3-4% rates, tightening): price likely −10-20%.

4. Symbolism last accessible 1955 program vestigeThe 9 racing 300 SLR roadsters reside in museums (Mercedes Museum, Indianapolis Motor Speedway Museum, closed private collections). W196 F1 monoplaces likewise. The sold Uhlenhaut example represented the final opportunity to acquire a vehicle from the 1954-1955 Silberpfeil program.

5. Technical desmodromic uniquenessDesmodromic valve train with mechanical closing (32 rocker arms, no springs). Unique technology in road automobiles, never reproduced since. 8,500 rpm regime, 310 hp, 104 hp/liter in 1955 (absolute period records).

Private auction sale — Exceptional procedure:

The strictly private invitation-only auction procedure itself constitutes a precedent in the ultra-high automotive market. Mercedes-Benz AG and RM Sotheby’s pre-selected 10 collectors according to criteria never publicly disclosed, but likely including:

The auction took place at Mercedes-Benz Museum Stuttgart on May 5, 2022, attended exclusively by the 10 invited guests. No press, no photographers, total confidentiality. The process lasted approximately 90 minutes according to unconfirmed sources. Opening price was never revealed (likely €80-100M per speculation).

Buyer identity: total anonymity 40 months

Since July 2022 (transaction finalization), no information has emerged regarding buyer identity. This anonymity, maintained despite intensive worldwide collector community surveillance, is remarkable. Unconfirmed speculation:

Anonymity maintenance suggests a profile valuing confidentiality above social visibility. Unlike other record buyers (David MacNeil Ferrari 250 GTO 2018 $70M, Ralph Lauren collections, Swiss Collector Albert Obrist), the 300 SLR buyer refuses all public exposure.

END FREE EXCERPT

The complete analysis (Sections 4 through 8) includes:

4. METHODICAL VALUATION

5. ACQUISITION AND CARRYING COSTS — COMPLETE DETAIL

6. 300 SL / 300 SLR COMPARATIVE — TECHNICAL AND MARKET HIERARCHY

7. TECHNICAL RISKS — DETAILED MAPPING

8. FINAL VERDICT

Final decision reference figures:

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS APPENDIX (excerpt)

M196 Engine: 8-cyl inline, 2982cc, 9.5:1 compression, desmodromic 16 valves 32 rocker arms, 310hp @ 7400 rpm, 104 hp/L, Bosch injection 150 bar, dry sump 12L

Chassis: CrMo 4130, 58kg bare, 18000 N⋅m/° rigidity, 1040kg total, 45/55 distribution, 2400mm wheelbase

Transmission: 5-speed non-synchro (2.35/1.58/1.19/1.00/0.85), ZF 45% differential, ratio 3.42:1

Performance: 0-100 km/h 6.8s estimated, Vmax 290 km/h measured, braking 100-0 38m, consumption 22-26 L/100km

Value: production 2 ex, sold 1 (May 2022 €135M), museum 1 (never for sale), 2025 valuation €130M-€140M, absolute auction record

COMPLETE ANALYSIS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST

Contact :

Document: Technical Expertise Mercedes-Benz 300 SLR Uhlenhaut Coupé Production: 2 examples (1 sold €135M May 2022, 1 museum never for sale)Date: November 2025Status: Technical analysis — Not investment/tax/legal advice

Mercedes W196R

Mercedes W196R, Mille Miglia, Fangio, Moss From legacy to a $51 715 000 Financial Grail

Mercedes W196R